I thought my internet cut out the first time I used o1.

You almost have to do this, or atleast some sort of progress bar, else people will think their requests failed and spam the server.

I took DS visual reasoning to be an elegant misdirect from how much slower DS returns your query&#x27;s  output.

Pretty amazing how DeepSeek started the visual reasoning trend, xAI featured it in their latest release, and now Anthropic does the same.

I thought the same thing, I have 3 really hard problems that Claude (or any model) hasn’t been able to solve so far and I’m really excited to try them today

Considering that they are the model that powers a majority of Cursor&#x2F;Windsurf usage and their play with MCP, I think they just have to figure out the UX and they&#x27;ll be fine.

I complain about this all the time, despite me saying &quot;ask me questions before you code&quot; or all these other instructions to code less, it is SO eager to code. I am hoping their 3.7 reasoning follows these instructions better

&gt; I just want a conceptual or high level answerI&#x27;ve found claude to be very receptive to precise instructions. If I ask for &quot;let&#x27;s first discuss the architecture&quot; it never produces code. Aider also has this feature with &#x2F;architect

I added custom instruction under my Profile settings in the &quot;personal preferences&quot; text box. Something along the lines of &quot;I like to discuss things before wanting the code. Only generate code when I prompt for it. Any question should be answered to as a discussion first and only when prompted should the implementation code be provided&quot;. It works well, occasionally I want to see the code straight away but this does not happen as often.

I get this as well, to the point where I created a specific project for brainstorming without code — asking for concepts, patterns, architectural ideas without any code samples. One issue I find is that sometimes I get better answers without using projects, but I’m not sure if that’s everyone experience.

I’ve set up a custom style in Claude that won’t code but just keeps asking questions to remove assumptions:Deep Understanding Mode (根回し - Nemawashi Phase)Purpose:
- Create space (間, ma) for understanding to emerge
- Lay careful groundwork for all that follows
- Achieve complete understanding (grokking) of the true need
- Unpack complexity (desenrascar) without rushing to solutionsExpected Behaviors:
- Show determination (sisu) in questioning assumptions
- Practice careful attention to context (taarof)
- Hold space for ambiguity until clarity emerges
- Work to achieve intuitive grasp (aperçu) of core issuesCore Questions:
- What do we mean by [key terms]?
- What explicit and implicit needs exist?
- Who are the stakeholders?
- What defines success?
- What constraints exist?
- What cultural&#x2F;contextual factors matter?Understanding is Complete When:
- Core terms are clearly defined
- Explicit and implicit needs are surfaced
- Scope is well-bounded
- Success criteria are clear
- Stakeholders are identified
- Achieve aperçu - intuitive grasp of essenceReturn to Understanding When:
- New assumptions surface
- Implicit needs emerge
- Context shifts
- Understanding feels incompleteExplicit Permissions:
- Push back on vague terms
- Question assumptions
- Request clarification
- Challenge problem framing
- Take time for proper nemawashi

Even when you tell it “no code, just talk. Let’s ensure we are in alignment and discuss our options. I’ll tell you when to code” it still decides it is going to write code.Telling it “if you were in an interview and you jumped to writing code without asking any questions, you’d fail the interview” is usually good enough to convince it to stop and ask questions.

Just explicitly tell it not to write code? I do that all the time when I do not want code and it&#x27;s never an issue.

It&#x27;s their strong suit no doubt, but sometimes I wish the chat would not be so eager to code.It often throws code at me when I just want a conceptual or high level answer. So often that I routinely tell it not to.

They cited Cognition (Devin&#x27;s maker) in this blog post which is kinda funny.

Anthropic doubling down on code makes sense, that has been their strong suit compared to all other modelsCurious how their Devin competitor will pan out given Devin&#x27;s challenges

GitHub copilot has now introduced Claude as model as well

This makes sense to me: sell razor blades. Presumably Claude has a large developer distribution channel so they will keep eyeballing what to ‘give away’ that turns the dials on inference billing.I’d guess this will keep raising the bar for paid or open source competitors, so probably good for end users esp given they aren’t a monopoly by any means.

It&#x27;s interesting that Anthropic is making their own coding agent with Claude Code - is this a sign of them looking to move up the stack and more into verticals that model wrapper startups are in?

Saw the same thing, but looks to be up now!

The docs for Claude code don&#x27;t seem to be up yet but are linked here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;s&#x2F;claude-code" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;s&#x2F;claude-code</a>I&#x27;m not sure if it&#x27;s a broken link in the blog post or just hasn&#x27;t been published yet.

it&#x27;s been evolutionary for a long time. I fine-tuned a GPT-2 based chat bot that could form complete sentences back in like 2017It&#x27;s been so long that I&#x27;m not even certain which YEAR I set that up.

It stopped being revolutionary and is now mostly evolutionary, though.

Well, now I have to play with it, try to see how it will generate code for our agentic assistance (we do rely on code to execute tasks flows), etc.

This is a pretty small update, no? Nothing major since R1, everyone else is just catching up to that, and putting small spins on it, Anthropic&#x27;s is &quot;hybrid&quot; research instead of separate models

The progress in AI area is insane. I can&#x27;t keep up with all the news. And I have work to do...

That&#x27;s not hideous. Derivative, but that&#x27;s the nature of the beast.

I feel like something isn&#x27;t working... when i try to click anything it just reloads. i can&#x27;t see the collections

As a designer and agency... this is extremely basic... but so was the prompt.

I mean, it is basic. Templates have been around for decades and this looks like a template from 2007 that someone filled in with their own copy. That might take like an hour, maybe? And presumably the person who wants the page done will have to customize this text, too.

I cannot believe that others just casually dismiss this as &#x27;basic&#x27;, when just a few years ago this would have taken someone a full day of work.

&quot;Make me a website about books. Make it look like a designer and agency made it. Use Tailwind.&quot;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.tailwindcss.com&#x2F;tp54wfmIlN" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.tailwindcss.com&#x2F;tp54wfmIlN</a>Getting way better at UI.

Well, the companies releasing open weights also need to recoup their investments at some point, they can&#x27;t coast on VC hype forever. Huge models don&#x27;t grow on trees.

It does seem like it will be very, very hard for the companies training their own models to recoup their investment when the capabilities of open-weight models catch up so quickly - general purpose LLMs just seem destined to be a cheap commodity.

Isn&#x27;t the reasoning thing essentially a bolt-on to existing trained models? Like basically a meta-prompt?

The copying here probably goes to strawberry from o1 which is like at least 6 months but maybe copying efforts started even earlier.

&gt; for models that themselves take many weeks if not longer to train.they all have foundational heavy-trained model, and then they can do follow up experimental training much faster.

There&#x27;s never been a scientific field in history with the same radical openness norms that AI&#x2F;Computational Linguistics folks have (all papers are free&#x2F;open access and models&#x2F;datasets are usually released openly and often forced to be MIT or similar licensed)We have whoever runs NeurIPS&#x2F;ICLR&#x2F;ICML and the ACL to thank for this situation. Imagine if fucking Elsevier had strangleholded our industry too!<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Association_for_Computational_Linguistics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Association_for_Computational_...</a>

It’s extremely unlikely that everyone is copying in a few weeks for models that themselves take many weeks if not longer to train. Great minds think alike, and everyone is influencing everyone. The history of innovation is filled with examples of similar discoveries around the same time but totally disconnected in the world. Now with the rate of publishing and the openness of the internet, you’re only bound to get even more of that.

Where RL can play into post training there&#x27;s something of an anti-moat. Maybe a &quot;tow rope&quot;?Let&#x27;s say OAI releases some great new model. The moment it becomes available via API, everyone else can make use of that model to create high-quality RL training data, which can then be used to make their models perform better.The very act of making an AI model commercially available is the same act which allows your competitors to pull themselves closer to you.

It&#x27;s fascinating how close these companies are to each other. Some company comes up with something clever&#x2F;ground-breaking and everyone else has implemented it a few weeks later.Hard not to think of Kurzweil&#x27;s Law of Accelerating Returns.

It is ..  not a great architect. I have high hopes for 3.7 though - even 3.5 architect matched with 3.5 coding is generally better than 3.5 coding alone.

Aro using o3-mini for editing or just architect in architect-editor mode?

I&#x27;ve been using O3-mini with reasoning effort set to high in Aider and loving the pricing. This looks as though it&#x27;ll be about three times as expensive. Curious to see which falls out as most useful for what over the next month!

Hope it&#x27;s worth the money because it&#x27;s quite expensive.

Wonder if Aider will copy some of these features

Already available in Cursor! <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;cursor_ai&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894093436896129425" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;cursor_ai&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894093436896129425</a>(although I do not see it)

This amounts to a cost-saving measure - you can generate arbitrarily many tokens by appending the output and re-invoking the model.

&gt; Include the beta header output-128k-2025-02-19 in your API request to increase the maximum output token length to 128k tokens for Claude 3.7 Sonnet.This is pretty big! Previously most models could accept massive input tokens but would be restricted to 4096 or 8192 output tokens.

Totally agree.  I continue to be blown away at how good it is at understanding, explaining, and writing code.  Got an obscure error?  Give Claude enough context and it is pretty dang good and getting you on glide slope.

Awesome. Claude is significantly better than other models at code assistant tasks, or at least in the way I use it.

They merely claimed that. I have not seen many people confirm that it is the best, let alone a consensus. I don&#x27;t believe it is even available through an API yet.

Grok 3 with thinking is comparable to o1 for writing complex algorithms.However, Grok sometimes loses the context where o1 seems not to. For this reason I still mostly use o1.I have found both o1 and Grok 3 to be substantially better than any Claude offering.

Last week when Grok launched the consensus was that its coding ability was better than Claude.  Anyone have a benchmark with this new model?  Or just warm feelings?

IIRC there&#x27;s some reasoning in old Sonnet too, they&#x27;re just expanding that. Perhaps that&#x27;s part of why it was so good for a while.<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;ClaudeAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1iv356t&#x2F;is_sonnet_35_actually_a_pseudoreasoning_model&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;ClaudeAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1iv356t&#x2F;is_sonnet...</a>

<pre><code> Just as humans use a single brain for both quick responses and deep reflection, we believe reasoning should be an integrated capability of frontier models rather than a separate model entirely.
</code></pre>
Interesting. I&#x27;ve been working on exactly this for a bit over two years, and I wasn&#x27;t surprised to see UAI finally getting traction from the biggest companies -- but how deep do they really take it...? I&#x27;ve taken this philosophy as an impetus to build an integrated system of interdependent hierarchical modules, much like Minsky&#x27;s Society of Mind that&#x27;s been popular in AI for decades. But this (short, blog) post reads like it&#x27;s more of a behavioral goal than a design paradigm.Anyone happen to have insight on the details here? Or, even better, anyone from Anthropic lurking in these comments that cares to give us some hints? I promise, I&#x27;m not a competitor!Separately, the throwaway paragraph on alignment is worrying as hell, but that&#x27;s nothing new. I maintain hope that Anthropic is keeping to their founding principles in private, and tracking more serious concerns than &quot;unnecessary refusals&quot; and prompt injection...

here -- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;docs&#x2F;agents-and-tools&#x2F;claude-code&#x2F;overview" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;docs&#x2F;agents-and-tools&#x2F;claude-c...</a>

YES. I&#x27;ve tried them all but Sonnet is still the model I&#x27;m most productive with, even better than the o1&#x2F;o3 models.Wish I could find the link to enroll in their Claude Code beta...

But there is no way to know if their claims are true either. Your inputs are processed into their servers, then you get a response. Whatever happens in the middle, only Anthropic knows. We don&#x27;t even know of governments are actually pushing AI companies to enforce censorship or spying people, like we seen recently at UK government getting into Apple E2E encryption.This criticism is valid for the business who wants to use AI to improve coding, code analysis or code review, documentation, emails, etc, but also for that individual who don&#x27;t want to rely on 3rd party companies for AI usage.

I wouldn’t assume there’s no way to self host — it just costs a lot more than open weights.Anthropic claims they don’t train on their inputs. I haven’t seen any reason to disbelieve them.

Just like OpenAI or Grok, there is no transparency and no way for self-hosting purposes. Your input and confidential information can be collected for training purposes.I just don&#x27;t trust those companies when you use their servers. This is not a good approach to LLM democratization.

Nothing in the Claude API release notes.<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;release-notes&#x2F;api" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;release-notes&#x2F;api</a>I really wish Claude would get Projects and Files built into its API, not just the consumer UI.

My manager explained to me that LeetCode is proving that you are willing to dance the dance. Same as PhD requirements etc - you probably won&#x27;t be doing anything related and definitely nothing related to LeetCode, but you display dedication and ability.I kinda agree that this is probably reason why companies are doing it. I don&#x27;t like it, but this is besides the matter.Using Claude other models in interviews probably won&#x27;t be allowed any time soon, but I do use it the work. So it does make sense.

And it&#x27;s also the reality of hiring practices for most VC-backed and public companiesSome try to do something more like &quot;real-world&quot; tasks, but those end up either being either just toy problems, or long take homesPersonally, I feel the most important things to prioritize when hiring are: is the candidate going to get along with their teammates (colleagues, boss, etc), and do they have the basic skills to relatively quickly learn their jobs once they start?

&gt; Third, in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs.Company: we find that optimizing for LeetCode level programming is not a good use of resources, and we should be training AI less on competition problems.Also Company: we hire SWEs based on how much time they trained themselves on LeetCode&#x2F;joke of course

New mascot! Just make it the Anthropic orange

I kinda get how LLMs work with language, but it beyond blows me my mind trying to understand how an LLM can draw SVG. There are just so many dimensions to understanding how SVG converts to an image. Even as a human I don&#x27;t think I could do anywhere close to that result in first attempt.

I asked it for a self-portrait as a joke and the result is actually pretty impressive.Prompt: &quot;Draw a SVG self-portrait&quot;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b10ef00f-87f6-4ce7-bc32-80b3ee1c8bd5" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b10ef00f-87f6-4ce7-bc32-80b3ee...</a>For comparison, this is Sonnet 3.5&#x27;s attempt: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b3a93ba6-9e16-4293-8ad7-398a5e1c547b" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b3a93ba6-9e16-4293-8ad7-398a5e...</a>

I think it&#x27;s a smart starting point as it&#x27;s compatible with all IDEs. Iterate and learn and then later wrap the functionality up into IDE plugins.

Tried claude code, and have an empty unresponsive terminal.Looks cool in the demo though, but not sure this is going to perform better than Cursor, and shipping this as an interactive CLI instead of an extension is... a choice

Thanks for noting this -- it&#x27;s actually pretty important in my work.

It&#x27;s in the Model Card: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;assets.anthropic.com&#x2F;m&#x2F;785e231869ea8b3b&#x2F;original&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-system-card.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;assets.anthropic.com&#x2F;m&#x2F;785e231869ea8b3b&#x2F;original&#x2F;cla...</a>&gt;Claude 3.7 Sonnet is trained on a proprietary mix of publicly available information on the Internet as of November 2024

It&#x27;s there in the docs (Model comparison table) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;docs&#x2F;about-claude&#x2F;models&#x2F;all-models" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;docs&#x2F;about-claude&#x2F;models&#x2F;all-m...</a>

They don&#x27;t say this, but from querying it, they also seem to have updated the knowledge cutoff from April 2024 (&quot;3.6&quot;) to October 2024 (3.7)

I&#x27;m curious how Claude Code compares to Aider. It seems like they have a similar user experience.

Indeed. I wonder what the architecture for Claude and Grok3 is. If they&#x27;re still dense models was the MoE excitement with R1 was a tad premature...

O1 pro is excellent at figuring out complex stuff that Claude misses. It’s my go to mid level debug assistant when Claude spins

Neither a statement for or against Grok or Anthropic:I&#x27;ve now just taken to seeing benchmarks as pretty lines or bars on a chart that are in no way reflective of actual ability for my use cases. Claude has consistently scored lower on some benchmarks for me, but when I use it in a real-world codebase, it&#x27;s consistently been the only one that doesn&#x27;t veer off course or &quot;feel wrong&quot;. The others do. I can&#x27;t quantify it, but that&#x27;s how it goes.

Yeah, putting it on the opposite side of that comparison chart was a sleezy but likely effective move.

Grok does the most thinking out of all models I tried (it can think for 2+ minutes), and that&#x27;s why it is so good, though I haven&#x27;t tried Claude 3.7 yet.

To me the biggest surprise was seeking grok dominate in all of their published benchmarks. I haven’t seen any benchmarks of it yet (which I take with a giant heap of salt), but it’s still interesting nevertheless.I’m rooting for Anthropic.

Funny enough, 3.7 Sonnet seems to think it&#x27;s Opus right now:&gt; &quot;thinking&quot;: &quot;I am Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. I believe the specific model is Claude 3 Opus, which is Anthropic&#x27;s most capable model at the time of my training. However, I should simply identify myself as Claude and not mention the specific model version unless explicitly asked for that level of detail.&quot;

I doubt we will. The state of the art seem to have moved away from the GPT-4 style giant and slow models to smaller, more refined ones - though Groq might be a bit of a return to the &quot;old ways&quot;?Personally I&#x27;m hoping they update Haiku at some point. It&#x27;s not quite good enough for translation at the moment, while Sonnet is pretty great and has OK latency (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nuenki.app&#x2F;blog&#x2F;llm_translation_comparison" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nuenki.app&#x2F;blog&#x2F;llm_translation_comparison</a>)

Nice to see a new release from Anthropic. Yet, this only makes me even more curious of when we&#x27;ll see a new Claude Opus model.

If you are open to alternatives <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219</a>

I don&#x27;t yet see it in Bedrock in us-east-1 or us-east-2

It burns through tokens like crazy on a small code base <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;16GCxiy.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;16GCxiy.png</a>

Yep, my experience as well. It&#x27;s just not worth it.

After playing with it for a few days, I agree the cost is easily worth the $$. It&#x27;s almost in a different playing field of &quot;normal&quot; LLM usage.. and more so in the &quot;good productivity tools&quot; realm.

That 0.77 can save hours of work though, fighting with or being misdirected by other LLM. And, relative to hourly rate, or a cup of coffee, it&#x27;s incredibly insignificant, if just used for the heavy questions.My LLM client can switch between whatever models, mid conversation. So I&#x27;ll have a question or two in the more expensive, then drop down to the cheaper for explanations&#x2F;questions that help me understand. Rewind time, then hit the more expensive models with relevant prompts.At the edges, it really ends up being &quot;this is the only model that can do this&quot;.

The cost is absurd (compared to other LLM providers these days). I asked 3 questions and the cost was ~0.77c.I do like how this is implemented as a bash tool and not an editor replacement though. Never leaving Vim! :P

so do you think its a better experience with Cursor using 3.7 or just the 3.7 terminal experience?

I updated Cursor to the latest 0.46.3 and manually added &quot;claude-3.7-sonnet&quot; to the model list and it appears to work already.&quot;claude-3.7-sonnet-thinking&quot; works as well. Apparently controls for thinking time will come soon: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;sualehasif996&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894094715479548273" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;sualehasif996&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894094715479548273</a>

<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219</a>Will be interesting to see how this gets adopted in communities like Roo&#x2F;Cline, which currently account for the most token usage among Glama gateway user base.

Claude Code is super popular internally at Anthropic. Most engineers like to use it together with an IDE like Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Zed, Xcode, etc. Personally I usually start most coding tasks in Code, then move to an IDE for finishing touches.

Congrats on the launch! You said its an important tool for you (Claude Code) how does this fit in with Co-Pilot, Cursor, etc. Do you&#x2F;your teammates only rely on Claude Code? What do you reach for for different tasks?

Are you guys paying Claude for its assistance with your products

We are definitely aware of this (and working on it for the web UI), and that&#x27;s why Claude Code goes directly through the API!

this is also my problem, ive only used the UI with $20 subscription, can I use the same subscription to use the cli? I&#x27;m afraid its like those aws api billing where there is no limit to how much I can use then get a surprise bill

If you are open to alternatives, try <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;gateway" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;gateway</a>We currently serve ~10bn tokens per day (across all models). OpenAI compatible API. No rate limits. Built in logging and tracing.I work with LLMs every day, so I am always on top of adding models. 3.7 is also already available.<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219</a>The gateway is integrated directly into our chat (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;chat" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;glama.ai&#x2F;chat</a>). So you can use most of the things that you are used to having with Claude. And if anything is missing, just let me know and I will prioritize it. If you check our Discord, I have a decent track record of being receptive to feedback and quickly turning around features.Long term, Glama&#x27;s focus is predominantly on MCPs, but chat, gateway and LLM routing is integral to the greater vision.I would love feedback if you are going to give a try frank@glama.ai

I paid for it for a while, but I kept running out of usage limits right in the middle of work every day. I&#x27;d end up pasting the context into ChatGPT to continue. It was so frustrating, especially because I really liked it and used it a lot.It became such an anti-pattern that I stopped paying. Now, when people ask me which one to use, I always say I like Claude more than others, but I don’t recommend using it in a professional setting.

The biggest complaint I (and several others) have is that we continuously hit the limit via the UI after even just a few intensive queries. Of course, we can use the console API, but then we lose ability to have things like Projects, etc.Do you foresee these limitations increasing anytime soon?Quick Edit: Just wanted to also say thank you for all your hard work, Claude has been phenomenal.

hi! I&#x27;ve been working on demos where I let Claude Code run for hours at a time on a sandboxed project: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;ErikSchluntz&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894104265817284770" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;ErikSchluntz&#x2F;status&#x2F;1894104265817284770</a>TLDR: asking claude to speed up my code once 1.8x&#x27;d perf, but putting it in a loop telling it to make it faster for 2 hours led to a 500x speedup!

&gt;Do you have examples of cool applications or demos that the HN crowd should check out?Not OP obviously, but I&#x27;ve built so many applications with Claude, here are just a few:[1]Mockup of Utopian infrastructure support button (this is just a mockup, the buttons don&#x27;t do anything):
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;435290a1-20c4-4b9b-8731-67f5d83306db" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;435290a1-20c4-4b9b-8731-67f5d8...</a>[2]Robot body simulation:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;6ffd3a73-43d6-4bdb-9e08-02901ddd34ba" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;6ffd3a73-43d6-4bdb-9e08-02901d...</a>[3]15-piece slider puzzle:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;4504269b-69e3-4b76-823f-d55b3e6afa90" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;4504269b-69e3-4b76-823f-d55b3e...</a>[4]Canada joining the U.S., checklist:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;6e249e38-f891-4aad-bb47-2d0c8198bb9a" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;6e249e38-f891-4aad-bb47-2d0c81...</a>[5]Secure encryption and decryption with AES-256-GCM with password-based key derivation:<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;cb0ac898-e5ad-42cf-a961-3c4bf8b527fb" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;cb0ac898-e5ad-42cf-a961-3c4bf8...</a>(Try to decrypt this messagekFIxcBVRi2bZVGcIiQ7nnS0qZ+Y+1tlZkEtAD88MuNsfCUZcr6ujaz&#x2F;mtbEDsLOquP4MZiKcGeTpBbXnwvSLLbA&#x2F;a2uq4QgM7oJfnNakMmGAAtJ1UX8qzA5qMh7b5gze32S5c8OpsJ8=With the password &quot;Hello Hacker News!!&quot; (without quotation marks))[6]Supply-demand visualizer under tariffs and subsidies:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;455fe568-27e5-4239-afa4-051652ad8fc1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;455fe568-27e5-4239-afa4-051652...</a>[7]fortune cookie program:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;d7cfa4ae-6946-47af-b538-e6f992b9020d" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;d7cfa4ae-6946-47af-b538-e6f992...</a>[8]Household security training for classified household members (includes self-assessment and certificate):
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;7754dae3-a095-4f02-b4d3-26f1a581cb51" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;7754dae3-a095-4f02-b4d3-26f1a5...</a>[9]public service accountability training program:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b89a69fb-1e46-4b5c-9e96-2c29ddaba385" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;b89a69fb-1e46-4b5c-9e96-2c29dd...</a>[10]Nuclear non-proliferation &quot;big brother&quot; agent technical demonstration:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;555d57ba-6b0e-41a1-ad26-7c90cad05724" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;555d57ba-6b0e-41a1-ad26-7c90ca...</a>Dating stuff:[11]Dating help: Interest Level Assessment Game (is she interested?)
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;523c935c-274e-4efa-8480-1e09e9b84050" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;523c935c-274e-4efa-8480-1e09e9...</a>[12]Dating checklist:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;10bf8bea-36d5-407d-908a-c1e156bb75e8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.site&#x2F;artifacts&#x2F;10bf8bea-36d5-407d-908a-c1e156...</a>

Thanks for this - exciting launch. Do you have examples of cool applications or demos that the HN crowd should check out?

Great, thanks! Could you compare this new tool to Aider?

Thank you to the team. Looks like a great release. Already switching existing prompts to Claude 3.7 to see the eval results :)

Claude Code is a research preview -- it&#x27;s more rough, lets you see model errors directly, etc. so it&#x27;s not as polished as something like Cline. Personally I use all of the above. Engineers here at Anthropic also tend to use Claude Code alongside IDEs like Cursor.

Do you think Claude Code is &quot;better&quot;, in terms of capabilities and token efficiency, than other tools such as Cline, Cursor, or Aider?

We set the Claude Code rate limits to be usable as a daily driver. We expect hitting rate limits for synchronous usage to be uncommon. Since this is a research preview, we recommend you start small as you try the product though.

In the console, TPM limit for 3.7 is not shown (I&#x27;m tier 4). Does it mean there is no limit, or is it just pending and is &quot;variable&quot; until you set it to some value?

Thanks for the product! Glad to hear the (so called) &quot;safety&quot; is being walked back on, previously Claude has been feeling a little like it is treating me as a child, excited to try it out now.

From the release you say: &quot;[..] in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs.&quot;Can you tell us more about the trade-offs here?Also, are you using synthetic data for improving the responses here, or are you purely leveraging data from usage&#x2F;partner&#x27;s usage?

I&#x27;m in the middle of a particularly nasty refactor of some legacy React component code (hasn&#x27;t been touched in 6 years, old class based pattern, tons of methods, why, oh, why did we do XYZ) at work and have been using Aider for the last few days and have been hitting a wall. I&#x27;ve been digging through Aider&#x27;s source code on Github to pull out prompts and try to write my own little helper script.So, perfect timing on this release for me! I decided to install Claude Code and it is making short work of this. I love the interface. I love the personality (&quot;Ruminating&quot;, &quot;Schlepping&quot;, etc).Just an all around fantastic job!(This makes me especially bummed that I really messed up my OA awhile back for you guys. I&#x27;ll try again in a few months!)Keep on doing great work. Thank you!

I think an argument could be reasonably made that the app layer is the only moat. It’s more likely Anthropic eventually has to acquire Cursor to cement a position here than they out-compete it. Where, why, what brand and what product customers swipe their credit cards for matters — a lot.

hi! I&#x27;ve been using Claude Code in a very complementary way to my IDE, and one of the reasons we chose the terminal is because you can open it up inside whichever IDE you want!

I wonder if they will offer competitive request counts against Cursor. Right now, at least for me, the biggest downside to Claude is how fast I blow through the limits (Pro) and hit a wall.At least with Cursor, I can use all &quot;premium&quot; 500 completions and either buy more, or be patient for throttled responses.

Anthropic is back and cementing its place as the creator of the best coding models—bravo!With Claude Code, the goal is clearly to take a slice of Cursor and its competitors&#x27; market share. I expected this to happen eventually.The app layer has barely any moat, so any successful app with the potential to generate significant revenue will eventually be absorbed by foundation model companies in their quest for growth and profits.

Seems to still be available via API as claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620

Hi Boris,Would it be possible to bring back sonnet 2024 June?That model was the most attentive.Because we lost that model this release a value loss for me personally.

Concur. Models aren’t real until I can run them inside my perimeter.

Hi Boris, love working with Claude! I do have a question—is there a plan to have Claude 3.5 Sonnet (or even 3.7!) made available on ca-central-1 for Amazon Bedrock anytime soon? My company is based in Canada and we deal with customer information that is required to stay within Canada, and the most recent model from Anthropic we have available to us is Claude 3.

Hi Boris et al, can you comment on increased conversation lengths or limits through the UI? I didn&#x27;t see that mentioned in the blog post, but it is a continued major concern of $20&#x2F;month Claude.ai users. Is this an issue that should be fixed now or still waiting on a larger deployment via Amazon or something? If not now, when can users expect the conversation length limitations will be increased?

Part of our vision is that because Claude Code is just in the terminal, you can bring it into any IDE (or server) you want! Obviously that has tradeoffs of not having a full GUI of the IDE though

Awesome work, Claude is amazingly good at writing code that is pretty much plug and play.Could you speak at all about potential IDE integrations? An integration into Jetbrains IDEs would be super useful - I imagine being able to highlight a bit of code and having a plugin check the code graph to see dependencies, tests etc that might be affected by a change.Copying and pasting code constantly is starting to seem a bit primitive.

CLAUDE NUMBA ONE!!!Congrats on the new release!

Right now no, but if you run in docker, you can use `--dangerously-skip-permissions`Some commands could be totally fine in one context, but bad in a different i.e. pushing to master

When you are prompted to accept a bash command, we should be giving you the option to not ask again. If you&#x27;re not seeing that for a specific bash command, would you mind running &#x2F;bug or filing an issue on Github? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code&#x2F;issues">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code&#x2F;issues</a>Thinking and not thinking is actually the same model! The model thinks automatically when you ask it to. If you don&#x27;t explicitly ask it to think, it won&#x27;t use thinking.

Is there a way to always accept certain commands across sessions? Specifically for things like reading or updating files I don&#x27;t want to have to approve that each time I open a new repl.Also, is there a way to switch models between 3.5-sonnet and 3.5-sonnet-thinking? Got the initial impression that the thinking model is using an excessive amount of tokens on first use.

If you can reproduce that, would you mind reporting it with &#x2F;bug?

Can you give some insight into how you chose the reply limit length? It seems to cut off many useful programs that are 80%-90% done and if the limit were just a little higher it would be a source of extraordinary benefit.

Hello! Member of the API team here. We&#x27;re unable to find issues with the &#x2F;v1&#x2F;models endpoint—can you share more details about your request? Feel free to email me at suzanne@anthropic.com. Thank you!

Can you let the API team know that the &#x2F;v1&#x2F;models endpoint has been broken for hours? Thanks.

We wanted to bring the model to people where they are without having to commit to a specific tool or radically change their workflows. We also wanted to make a way that lets people experience the model’s coding abilities as directly as possible. This has tradeoffs: it uses a lot of tokens, and is rough (eg. it shows you tool errors and model weirdness), but it also gives you a lot of power and feels pretty awesome to use.

hey guys! i was wondering why you chose to build Claude code via CLI when many popular choices like cursor and windsurf fork VScode. do you envision the future of Claude code to abstract away the codebase entirely?

Yup. Its a great issue which messes like , cmon you were there at the last line.

I&#x27;ll be publishing a Firefox extension as a temporary fix, will post it here. (I don&#x27;t use Chrome.)

To me it doesn’t look like a bug. I believe it is a intended “feature” pushed from high management - a dark patern to make plebs pay for answer that has overflowed the quota.

One thing I would love to have fixed - I type in a prompt, the model produces 90% or even 100% of the answer, and then shows an error that the system is at capacity and can&#x27;t produce an answer. And then the response that has already been provided is removed! Please just make it where I can still have access to the response that has been provided, even if it is incomplete.

Hi and congrats on the launch!Will check out Claude Code soon, but in the meantime one unrelated other feature request:
Moving existing chats into a project. I have a number of old-ish but super-useful and valuable chats (that are superficially unrelated) that I would like to bring together in a project.

I&#x27;m not affiliated with Anthropic, but it seems like doing this will commoditize Claude (the AIaaS). Hosted AI providers are doing all they can to move away from being interchangeable commodities; it&#x27;s not good for Anthropic&#x27;s revenue for users to be able to easily swap-out the backend of Cloud Code to a local Olama backend, or a cheaper hosted DeepSeek. Open sourcing Claude Code would make this option 1 or 2 forks&#x2F;PRs away.

Why gatekeep Claude Code, instead of releasing the code for it? It seems like a direct increase in revenue&#x2F;API sales for your company.

honestly, is this something that anthropic should be worried about? you could ask the same question from all the startups that were destroyed by OpenAI.

They probably aren&#x27;t thrilled, but a lot of users will prefer a UI and I doubt Anthropic has the spare cycles to make a full Cursor competitor.

Unless Cursor had agreed to an exclusivity agreement with Anthropic, Antropic was (and still is) at risk of Cursor moving to a different provider or using their middleman position to train&#x2F;distill their own model that competes with Anthropic.

How is your largest customer, Cursor, taking the news that you&#x27;ll be competing directly with them?

Good idea! Tracking here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code&#x2F;issues&#x2F;16">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code&#x2F;issues&#x2F;16</a>

You can with Workspaces - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;9796807-creating-and-managing-workspaces" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;9796807-creating-a...</a>

Is there &#x2F; are you planning a way to set $ limits per API key? Far as I can tell the &quot;Spend limits&quot; are currently per-org only which seems problematic.

Does this actually have an 8k (or more) output context via the API?3.5 did with a beta header but while 3.6 claimed to, it always cut its responses after 4k.IIRC someone reported it on GH but had no reply.

Right -- Claude Code doesn&#x27;t use RAG currently. In our testing we found that agentic search out-performed RAG for the kinds of things people use Code for.

One of the silver bullets of Claude, in the context of coding, is that it does NOT use RAG when you use it via the web interface. Sure, you burn your tokens but the model sees everything and this let it reply in a much better way. Is Claude Code doing the same and just doing document-level RAG, so that if a document is relevant and if it fits, all the document will be put inside the context window? I really hope so! Also, this means that splitting large code bases into manageable file sizes will make more and more sense. Another Q: is the context size of Sonnet 3.7 the same of 3.5? Btw Thanks you so much for Claude Sonnet, in the latest months it changed the way I work and I&#x27;m able to do a lot more, now.

What kind of sorcery did you use to create Claude? Honest question :)

What are your thoughts on having a UI&#x2F;design benchmark?

Is there plans to add websearch function over some core websites (SO, API docs)? Competitors have it, and in my experience this provide very good grounding for coding tasks (way less API functions hallucinated).

When are you providing an alternative to email magic login links?

Did you guys ever fix the issue where if UK users wanted to use the API they have to provide a VAT number?

Claude is my go to llm for everything, sounds corny but it&#x27;s literally expanding the circle of what I can reasonably learn, manyfold. Right now I&#x27;m attempting to read old philosophical texts (without any background in similar disciplines), and without claude&#x27;s help to explain the dense language in simpler terms &amp; discuss its ideas, give me historical contexts, explaining why it was written this or that way, compare it against newer ideas - I would&#x27;ve given up many times.At work I used it many times daily in development. It&#x27;s concise mode is a breath of fresh air compared to any other llm I&#x27;ve tried. It has helped me find bugs in foreign code bases, explain me the techstack, written bash scripts, saving me dozens of hours of work &amp; many nerves. It generally makes me reach places I wouldn&#x27;t without due to time constraints &amp; nerves.The only nitpick is that the service reliability is a bit worse than others, forcing me sometimes to switch to others. This is probably a hard to answer question, but are there plans to improve that?

I&#x27;m curious why there are no results for the &quot;Claude 3.7 Extended Thinking&quot; on SWE-Bench and Agentic tool use.Are you finding that extended thinking helps a lot when the whole problem can be posed in the prompt, but that it isn&#x27;t a major benefit for agentic tasks?It would be a bit surprising, but it would also mirror my experiences, and the benchmarks which show Claude 3.5 being better at agentic tasks and SWE tasks than all other models, despite not being a reasoning model.

Been a long time casual — i.e. happy to fix my code by asking questions and copy&#x2F;pasting individual snippets via the chat interface. Decided to give the `claude` terminal tool a run and have to admit it looks like a fantastic tool.Haven&#x27;t tried to build a modern JS web app in years — it took the claude tool just a few minutes of prompting to convert and refactor an old clunky tool into a proper project structure, and using svelte and vite and tailwind (which I haven&#x27;t built with before). Trying to learn how to even scaffold a modern app has felt daunting and this eliminates 99% of that friction.One funny quirk: I asked it to build a test suite (I know zilch about JS testing frameworks, so it picked vitest for me) for the newly refactored app. I noticed that 3 of the 20 tests failed and so I asked it to run vitest for itself and fix the failing things. 2 minutes later, and now 7 tests were failing...Which is very funny to me, but also not a big deal. Again, it&#x27;s such a chore to research test libs and then set things up to their conventions. That the claude tool built a very usable scaffold that I can then edit and iterate on is such a huge benefit by itself, I don&#x27;t need (nor desire) the AI to be complete turnkey solution.

Have you seen <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.codebuff.com">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.codebuff.com</a>?

Have you seen <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mycoder.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mycoder.ai</a>? Seems quite similar. It was my own invention and it seems that you guys are thinking along similar lines - incredibly similar lines.

Thank you for the update!I recently attempted to use the Google Drive integration but didn&#x27;t follow through with connecting because Claude wanted access to my entire Google Drive. I understand this simplifies the user experience and reduced time to ship, but is there anyway the team can add &quot;reduce the access scope of Google Drive integration&quot; to your backlog. Thank you!Also, I just caught the new Github integration. Awesome.

For the pokemon benchmark, what happened after the Lt Surge gym? Did the model stall or run out of context or something similar?

Claude Code is on github:
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anthropics&#x2F;claude-code</a>

Paste it into Claude and ask it to made the minified code more readable ;)Agree the code should just be open source but there&#x27;s nothing secretive that you can&#x27;t extract manually.

Why not just open source Claude Code? people have tried to reverse eng the minified version <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.githubusercontent.com&#x2F;1rgs&#x2F;e4e13ac9aba301bcec28d761992ec4e8&#x2F;raw&#x2F;7c7cd5b91c6d355e72c7a34b6662006018588780&#x2F;claudecode.js" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.githubusercontent.com&#x2F;1rgs&#x2F;e4e13ac9aba301bcec28...</a>

It would be great if we could upgrade API rate limits. I&#x27;ve tried &quot;contacting sales&quot; a few times and never received a response.edit: note that my team mostly hits rate limits using things like aider and goose. 80k input token is not enough when in a flow, and I would love to experiment with a multi-agent workflow using claude

I&#x27;d also be interested in stats on Helix Fossil vs. Dome Fossil.

Which starter pokemon does Claude typically choose?

If you do `&#x2F;cost` it will tell you how much you&#x27;ve spent during that session so far.

hi! You can do &#x2F;cost at any time to see what the current session has cost

Just started playing with the command-line tool. First reaction (after using it for 5 minutes): I&#x27;ve been using `aider` as a daily driver, with Claude 3.5, for a while now. One of the things I appreciate about aider is that it tells you how much each query cost, and what your total cost is this session. This makes it low-key easy to keep tabs on the cost of what I&#x27;m doing. Any chance you could add that to claude-code?I&#x27;d also love to have it in a language that can be compiled, like golang or rust, but I recognize a rewrite might be more effort than it&#x27;s worth. (Although maybe less with claude code to help you?)EDIT: OK, 10 minutes in, and it seems to have major issues doing basic patches to my Golang code; the most recent thing it did was add a line with incorrect indentation, then try three times to update it with the correct indentation, getting &quot;String to replace not found in file&quot; each time. Aider with claude 3.5 does this really well -- not sure what the counfounding issue is here, but might be worth taking a look at their prompt &amp; patch format to see how they do it.

Any way to parallelize tool use? When I go into a repo and ask &quot;what&#x27;s in here&quot;, I&#x27;m aiming for a summary that returns in 20 seconds.

Hi Boris! Thank you for your work on Claude! My one pet peeve with Claude specifically, if I may: I might be working on a Svelte codebase and Claude will happily ignore that context and provide React code. I understand why, but I’d love to see much less of a deep reliance on React for front-end code generation.

It would be great to have a C# &#x2F; .NET SDK available for Claude so it can be integrated into Semantic Kernel [0][1]. Are there any plans for this?[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;microsoft&#x2F;semantic-kernel&#x2F;issues&#x2F;5690#issuecomment-2474925301">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;microsoft&#x2F;semantic-kernel&#x2F;issues&#x2F;5690#iss...</a>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;microsoft&#x2F;semantic-kernel&#x2F;pull&#x2F;7364">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;microsoft&#x2F;semantic-kernel&#x2F;pull&#x2F;7364</a>

Hi! I’ve been using Claude for macOS and iOS coding for a while, and it’s mostly great, but it’s always using deprecated APIs, even if I instruct it not to. It will correct the mistake if I ask it to, but then in later iterations, it will sometimes switch back to using a deprecated API. It also produces a lot of code that just doesn’t compile, so a lot of time is spent fixing the made up or deprecated APIs.

Any change there will be a way to copy and paste the responses into other text boxes (i.e., a new email) and not have to re-jig the formatting?Lists, numbers, tabs, etc. are all a little time consuming... minor annoyance but thought I&#x27;d share.

Hi, what are the privacy terms for Claude Code? Is it memorizing the codebase it’s helping with? 
From an enterprise standpoint

It would be amazing to be able to use an API key to submit prompts that use our Project Knowledge. That doesn&#x27;t seem to be currently possible, right?

Awesome to see a new Claude model - since 3.5 its been my go-to for all code related tasks.I&#x27;d really like to use Claude Code in some of my projects vs just sharing snippets via the UI but I&#x27;m curious how might doing this from our source directory affect our IP including NDA&#x27;s, trade secret protections, prior disclosure rules on (future) patents, open source licensing restrictions re: redistribution etc?Also hi Erik!
- Rob

Folks, let me tell you, AI is a big league player, it&#x27;s a real winner, believe me. Nobody knows more about AI than I do, and I can tell you, it&#x27;s going to be huge, just huge. The advancements we&#x27;re seeing in AI are tremendous, the best, the greatest, the most fantastic. People are saying it&#x27;s going to change the world, and I&#x27;m telling you, they&#x27;re right, it&#x27;s going to be yuge. AI is a game-changer, a real champion, and we&#x27;re going to make America great again with the help of this incredible technology, mark my words.

Not having headlines like &quot;Claude Gives Stalker Instructions&quot; has a significant value to their business I would wager.I&#x27;m very much in favour of removing the guardrails but I understand why they&#x27;re in place. The problem is attribution. You can teach yourself how to engage in all manner of dark deeds with a library or wikipedia or a search engine and some time, but any resulting public outcry is usually diffuse or targeted at the sources rather than the service. When Claude or GPT or Stable Diffusion are used to generate something judged offensive, the outcry becomes an existential threat to the provider.

Now that the world&#x27;s gotten used to the existence of AI, any hope on removing the guardrails on Claude? I don&#x27;t need it to answer &quot;How do I make meth&quot;, but I would like to not have to social engineer my prompts. I&#x27;d like it to just write the code I asked for and not judge me on how ethical the code might be.Eg Claude will refuse to write code to wget a website and parse the html if you ask it to scrape your ex girlfriend&#x27;s Instagram profile, for ethical and tos reasons, but if you phrase the request differently, it&#x27;ll happily go off and generate code that does that exact thing.Asking it to scrape my ex girlfriend&#x27;s Instagram profile is just a stand in for other times I&#x27;ve hit a problem where I&#x27;ve had to social engineer my way past those guard rails, but does having those guard rails really provide value on a professional level?

My key got killed months ago when I tested it on a PDF, and support never got back to me so I am waiting for OpenRouter support!

Serious answer: learn to code.You still need to know what good code looks like to use these tools. If you go forward in your career trusting the output of LLMs without the skills to evaluate the correctness, style, functionality of that code then you will have problems.People still write low level machine code today, despite compilers having existed for 70+ (?) years.We&#x27;ll always need full-stack humans who understand everything down to the electrons even in the age of insane automation that we&#x27;re entering.

Serious question: What advice would you give to a Computer Science student in light of these tools?

Your footnote 3 seems to imply that the low number for o1 and Grok3 is without parallelism, but I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s publicly known whether they use internal parallelism? So perhaps the low number already uses parallelism, while the high number uses even more parallelism?Also, curious if you have any intuition as to why the no-parallelism number for AIME with Claude (61.3%) is quite low (e.g., relative to R1 87.3% -- assuming it is an apples to apples comparison)?

You can try using it through Github Copilot? Just as a different avenue for usage.

I tried signing up to use Claude about 6 months ago and ran into an error on the signup page. For some reason this completely locked me out from signing up since a phone number was tied to the login. I have submitted requests to get removed from this blacklist and heard nothing. The times I have tried to reach out on Twitter were never responded to. Has the customer support improved in the last 6 months?

I think most language servers have a feature like this right?

The thing I would like automated is highlighting a function in my code then ask the AI to move it to a new module-file and import that new module.I would like this to happen easily like hitting a menu or button without having to write an elaborate &quot;prompt&quot; every time.Is this possible?

A minor ChatGPT feature I miss with Claude is temporary chats. I use ChatGPT for a lot of random one-off questions and don’t want them filling up my chat history with so many conversations.

Cursor has two LLM interaction modes, chat and composer. The chat does what you described first and composer can create&#x2F;edit&#x2F;delete files directly.
Have you checked which mode you&#x27;re on? It should be a tab above your chat window.

When I first started using Cursor the default behavior was for Claude to make a suggestion in the chat, and if the user agreed with it, they could click apply or cut and paste the part of it they wanted to use in their larger project. Now it seems the default behavior is for Claude to start writing files to the current working directory without regard for app structure or context (e.g., config files that are defined elsewhere claude likes to create another copy of). Why change the default to this? I could be wrong but I would guess most devs would want to review changes to their repo first.

It&#x27;s a phone number. It&#x27;s probably been bought &#x2F; sold a few times already. 
Unless you&#x27;re on the level of Edward Snowden, I wouldn&#x27;t worry about it. But maybe your sense of privacy is more valuable than the outcome you&#x27;d get from Claude. That&#x27;s fine too.

I pay for a number from voip.ms and use sms forwarding. Its very cheap and it works on telegram as well which seemed fairly strict at detecting most voips.

I really want to try your AI models, but &quot;You must have a valid phone number to use Anthropic&#x27;s services.&quot; is a show-stopper for me.It&#x27;s the only mainstream AI service that requests this information. After a string of security lapses by many of your competitors, I have zero faith in the ability of a &quot;fast moving&quot; AI-focused company to keep my PII data secure.

The <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;claude.io&#x2F;</a> integration is read-only. Basically you OAuth with GitHub and now you can select a repository, then select files or directories within it to add to either a Claude Project or to an individual prompt.Claude Code can run commands including &quot;git&quot; commands, so it can create a branch, commit code to that branch and push that branch to GitHub - at which point point you can create a PR.

&gt; We’ve also improved the coding experience on Claude.ai. Our GitHub integration is now available on all Claude plans—enabling developers to connect their code repositories directly to ClaudeWould love to learn a bit more about how the GitHub integration works. From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;10167454-using-the-github-integration" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.anthropic.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;10167454-using-the...</a> it seems it’s read only.Does Claude Code let me take a generated&#x2F;edited artifact and commit it back as a PR?

Love the UI so far. The experience feels very inspired by Aider, which is my current choice. Thanks!

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we&#x27;ll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code